Page 20 of 20 FirstFirst ... 10181920
Results 191 to 194 of 194

Thread: Is CSS flawed?

  1. #191
    Q-School Graduate HughJars's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Aberdeenshire
    Posts
    944

    Re: Is CSS flawed?

    Quote Originally Posted by rosecott View Post
    Would you rather have it based on the score you might take?
    I explained the logic above.

  2. #192
    Q-School Graduate HughJars's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Aberdeenshire
    Posts
    944

    Re: Is CSS flawed?

    Quote Originally Posted by Maninblack4612 View Post
    And a scratch golfer's handicap is based on the score he's likely to take against Standard Scratch!
    Not what we're talking about here.

  3. #193
    Money List Winner
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    9,100

    Re: Is CSS flawed?

    Quote Originally Posted by HughJars View Post
    This is the issue, SSS is calculated on what the course assessors think a scratch golfer will play the course in.

    Our course for example has no driveable par 4s, and the par 5 (9 holer) is 524 yards, clearly your scratch golfer can get home in two, and largely it'd be assumed this is where the two under par SSS of 70 comes from.

    The problem being at 425 yards there's a burn perpendicular to the hole, which in most circumstances is a big carry for the average golfer, meaning a forced lay up and an approach that could be anything from 110yds to 160 yds. For the average golfer therefore it becomes anything but a pick up birdie chance, which it is for a scratch golfer.
    Your understanding of the calculation of SSS is a little flawed from what you have put here. Drivable par 4s and/or the ability to reach a particular hole in 2 strokes arent the starting point, or even a deciding factor. To illustrate - 2 identical courses with 18 par 4 holes; one with each hole at 420 yrs and the other with each hole at 390 yrs would have a difference in SSS of between 1 and 2 (depending on how the exact numbers work out, and therfore any rounding). Average hole length is the issue rather than any extremes on one particular hole.
    some metal woods,
    any old irons,
    Pick up balls....

    12.2 and moving the wrong way again...

  4. #194
    Ryder Cup Winner fundy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Milton Keynes, Bucks
    Posts
    14,243

    Re: Is CSS flawed?

    Quote Originally Posted by fundy View Post
    Why can CSS go up 3 shots and even to RO but only come down from SSS by 1 shot?

    Our club champs round 1, the course was defenseless, receptive greens and no wind and tees/pins were on the generous side. Par 72 SSS 72 CSS 71.

    In a field of 99, there were two net 61s, 16 scores of net 69 or better, 33 scores of net 71 or better and half the field scored net 73 or better

    Surely CSS should be coming down more than 1 shot if the system is working fully?
    any of the experts explain why it can go up 3+ shots but only come down 1 from SSS?
    In the bag:
    TM M1 9.5 degree
    TM M1 17 degree hybrid
    Orka RS1/RS3 Irons 3-PW
    Orka RS10 Wedges 52,56,60
    Ping Ketsch

    Handicap: 7

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Latest Golf News

What Tour Players Splash Their Cash On

With millions in the bank, what do pro golfers spend their money on?

June 21, 2018

Play in the BMW Golf Cup International at Woburn

Golf Monthly readers are being offered the exclusive opportunity to play in the Regional Final for the BMW Golf Cup International over the superb Marquess Course at Woburn with a chance to go on and compete in the National and World Finals in St Andrews and Mexico.

June 21, 2018

Mickelson “Embarrassed And Disappointed” After US Open Penalty

The five-time major winner has revealed that he is embarrassed and disappointed by his episode last week

June 20, 2018

Why Do Golfers Shout Fore?

What is the etymology of this golfing word of warning?

June 20, 2018