Page 13 of 13 FirstFirst ... 3111213
Results 121 to 128 of 128
  1. #121
    Global Moderator One Planer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Modsville
    Posts
    14,383

    Re: Paul Casey, is he too negative?

    I think that stance will only weaken European options over time.

    Let's be honest, the PGA tour is where the money is. Players will always move with the money. You only have to look at the prize funds between the tours.

    For Rahm to openly state hell join the ET purely for Ryder Cup contention only echoes my point.

    Playing a token number of events is not likely to gain enough points to qualify automatically so is heavily reliant on a captains pick.

    The only difference between Rahm and Caseys situation is one openly admits to using a tour as a means to an end, the other focusing on good golf but without the possibility of a pick.

    Doesn't sit right with me.
    ... The moderator formally known as Gareth

    Callaway Woods. Some Cleveland Forged Bits and Bobs and a Lovely Edel Putter.

    Tastefully wrapped in Ilac and Scott Readman Concepts Headcovers

    2016 Handicap - 13.6>13.1>13.1>11.8> Clause 23 adjustment > 10.8 >10.9>10.9>11.0

  2. #122
    Grand Slam Winner Imurg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Aylesbury Bucks
    Posts
    22,389

    Re: Paul Casey, is he too negative?

    Quote Originally Posted by One Planer View Post
    I think that stance will only weaken European options over time.

    Let's be honest, the PGA tour is where the money is. Players will always move with the money. You only have to look at the prize funds between the tours.

    For Rahm to openly state hell join the ET purely for Ryder Cup contention only echoes my point.

    Playing a token number of events is not likely to gain enough points to qualify automatically so is heavily reliant on a captains pick.

    The only difference between Rahm and Caseys situation is one openly admits to using a tour as a means to an end, the other focusing on good golf but without the possibility of a pick.

    Doesn't sit right with me.
    Rahm won't need a pick. He'll most likely pick up enough points from the Majors and WGCs...he's only playing the ET events to get his qualification.
    The bulk of the European Team live and play the bulk of their golf in America. They play enough events on the ET to qualify for the RC.
    Not exactly helping the ET......
    Is it Europe Vs USA or the ET Vs USA..?
    Surely the best team should be picked? Having such a long qualification process can lead to someone qualifying by Jan/Feb and then losing all form in the next 6 months.
    I think the European Team should be just that - a team of Europeans....and the best ones too, regardless of where they ply their trade
    Epic 10°
    Big Bertha 3w 15°
    Big Bertha 5w 19°
    Big Bertha 4h 22°
    Launcher 5h 26°
    Legacy Black V 6-PW
    X 50/12
    MD2 54/14 , 58/14c
    ProType 2-Ball/TT3

    Handicap 7.7 at Whipsnade Park

    You might be a King or a Little Street Sweeper but sooner or later you dance with The Reaper...

  3. #123
    Hall of Famer HomerJSimpson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Bracknell - Berkshire
    Posts
    59,277

    Re: Paul Casey, is he too negative?

    Quote Originally Posted by Imurg View Post
    Rahm won't need a pick. He'll most likely pick up enough points from the Majors and WGCs...he's only playing the ET events to get his qualification.
    The bulk of the European Team live and play the bulk of their golf in America. They play enough events on the ET to qualify for the RC.
    Not exactly helping the ET......
    Is it Europe Vs USA or the ET Vs USA..?
    Surely the best team should be picked? Having such a long qualification process can lead to someone qualifying by Jan/Feb and then losing all form in the next 6 months.
    I think the European Team should be just that - a team of Europeans....and the best ones too, regardless of where they ply their trade
    Good point about qualifying too early and I think Willett was a prime example losing all three games he was involved in and clearly not the man playing anywhere near his Masters form (and hasn't since in truth). I firmly feel we need players playing well and if these are players doing so on the PGA tour then it shouldn't matter. In fact for the next game in the US you could argue that form in those conditions would be a distinct advantage irrespective of whether they have played sufficient ET matching tournaments.

    You can understand why the ET want to protect their tour and their RC investment and the entry criteria isn't perhaps as punitive as it could be (or indeed probably was historically) but golf is becoming a global game and the top players will cherry pick their events to suit their schedules.

  4. #124
    Hall of Famer Liverpoolphil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    36,738

    Re: Paul Casey, is he too negative?

    Quote Originally Posted by Imurg View Post
    Rahm won't need a pick. He'll most likely pick up enough points from the Majors and WGCs...he's only playing the ET events to get his qualification.
    The bulk of the European Team live and play the bulk of their golf in America. They play enough events on the ET to qualify for the RC.
    Not exactly helping the ET......
    Is it Europe Vs USA or the ET Vs USA..?
    Surely the best team should be picked? Having such a long qualification process can lead to someone qualifying by Jan/Feb and then losing all form in the next 6 months.
    I think the European Team should be just that - a team of Europeans....and the best ones too, regardless of where they ply their trade
    The qualification points has changed to the point I believe any points scored after the PGA are worth 1.5 so players playing well later in the year will be getting more points that playing well earlier in the season. Also any events that are being played at the same time as a Rolex event will score no points

    It’s Europe looked after by the ET - they are the ones the fork out all the time and money - take away the need for a player to be a member of their tour then who looks after the team ?

    Having players like Rahm , Stenson etc etc come over and play certain events keep them alive.

  5. #125
    Global Moderator One Planer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Modsville
    Posts
    14,383

    Re: Paul Casey, is he too negative?

    I perfectly understand the ET wanting to protect their brand.

    I dm dinky feel that the qualifying criteria could be loosened to allow the best players at the time to be selected.
    ... The moderator formally known as Gareth

    Callaway Woods. Some Cleveland Forged Bits and Bobs and a Lovely Edel Putter.

    Tastefully wrapped in Ilac and Scott Readman Concepts Headcovers

    2016 Handicap - 13.6>13.1>13.1>11.8> Clause 23 adjustment > 10.8 >10.9>10.9>11.0

  6. #126
    Global Moderator One Planer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Modsville
    Posts
    14,383

    Re: Paul Casey, is he too negative?

    'Bjorn wants Casey for Ryder Cup'

    http://www.skysports.com/share/11073983

    This'll be interesting.
    ... The moderator formally known as Gareth

    Callaway Woods. Some Cleveland Forged Bits and Bobs and a Lovely Edel Putter.

    Tastefully wrapped in Ilac and Scott Readman Concepts Headcovers

    2016 Handicap - 13.6>13.1>13.1>11.8> Clause 23 adjustment > 10.8 >10.9>10.9>11.0

  7. #127
    Tour Rookie londonlewis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Surrey
    Posts
    1,366

    Re: Paul Casey, is he too negative?

    I initially disliked Paul Casey when I first took up golf. So this will have been around 2008 I suppose. I think it was because he has an air of arrogance during interviews. I can't say I am an out and out fan of his but I like him. Terrific golfer and as others have mentioned, he hasn't delivered winning results on par with his talent.

    I'd like to see him in the Ryder Cup though. I think he would be good on that platform.
    I discuss forum threads, therefore I am

  8. #128
    Assistant Pro
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    145

    Re: Paul Casey, is he too negative?

    Quote Originally Posted by Imurg View Post
    I think the European Team should be just that - a team of Europeans....and the best ones too, regardless of where they ply their trade
    This for me all day long
    In The Bag
    • Callaway Epic
    • X2 Hot 3 Deep
    • Ping G15 5I-PW
    • Callaway MD 3 - 52 58 64
    • Ping Scottsdale TR

    Current Handicap - 12.3

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Latest Golf News

Quiz Of The Week – 20th October

Test your knowledge of this week in golf with our latest quiz!

October 20, 2017

American Golf Deals: The Best Current Offers

We check out the best deal that retailer American Golf currently have on their site

October 20, 2017

Amazon Golf Deals – The Best Current Offers

Amazon is an incredible place to buy anything of course, but the golf section on the website is a great place to find some goodies for your game

October 20, 2017

Five Of The Best Clifftop Golf Courses

Our historic links are the lifeblood and roots of golf, but clifftop courses offer a coastal contrast that is often even more dramatic

October 20, 2017

7 Things We Expected In 2017 That Didn’t Happen

It's been a year of surprises in 2017, Rory didn't win a fifth major and Matsuyama didn't reach the world #1 spot

October 19, 2017